Truth stands above everything.

Recently, at a school, a student raised his hand against a teacher, and this caused a huge uproar. Then the question of how students had come to this point made me think. And I saw the main factor in the fact that there are almost no male teachers in schools and that nearly 99.9 percent of teachers are women. Just as the role of the father and the mother is equally important in raising a child, it is an undeniably clear truth how important the role of the male teacher is in the upbringing of boys. A child takes his color from those older than him. What a woman's nature is like is known to every person who has come of age: — women are prone to emotion; they cannot see far ahead when making decisions; — women are hasty, which is why they quickly quarrel; — women do not admit their mistakes; only with great difficulty may a woman own up to her mistake; — women are delicate and fond of adorning themselves; — women are kind and compassionate, and harshness and coarseness are alien to them. This is their feminine quality; it cannot be otherwise; in this sense, these qualities are an adornment for women and a fault for men. A boy is the future head of a family. Protecting the homeland, strength, seriousness, stability, managing his feelings, composure and a number of responsibilities are required of him. These qualities and traits begin to form in a boy from the age of six or seven. Most importantly, it is not a woman but a man who can teach these traits; moreover, these qualities are learned not from words but from example. Precisely in this important period — between the ages of 7 and 18, the period when a boy is formed as a person — in our society a boy hardly sees his father; he communicates only with his mother; and at school he remains in the hands of teachers who are all women. As a result, there is absolutely no force to restrain him and to form in him determination, manners and morals, fairness and integrity, thoughtfulness and reflection. And the boy grows up frivolous, doing whatever comes into his head; not keeping his promises; not feeling the responsibility of a family; with quickly changing decisions; incapable of independent decisions; cowardly and at the same time aggressive; fussing a lot over his appearance. Now, if he is treated with the firmness characteristic of men, he freely raises his hand against his teacher; he curses women teachers; and this is becoming almost widespread. Some evidence: Video 1 Video 2 Video 3 Source 4 Source 5

In my humble opinion, every sensible person will confirm this truth; therefore, I believe that measures must be taken to bring strong and intelligent, learned and resourceful male teachers back to schools. The reasons we have mentioned also lie behind our young men today being irresponsible, freeloaders and unready to start a family. Recently we launched the online project “Xarakter” (“Character”). The goal is to form a manly character in young men; to raise a nature that keeps its promises, is devoted to family, values women and is self-confident. It consists of a number of practical stages. As part of the announcement of this project, we wrote: “Boys who have been taught by women teachers for 12 years at school are not developing a male character. That is why today's 18-year-old lads still have no worldview, and the traits of women are noticeable in their actions, emotions and relationships. As a result of a woman's upbringing, a boy grows up deprived of the determination, keeping one's word, toughness, courage and resourceful thinking characteristic of a man.” Precisely this part drew objections from two female teachers. One of them wrote: “As a teacher of 20 years, I am writing this letter to you. Even if your last post was meant for men, I consider it an insult to women teachers like me. We have devoted our lives to children's education, consoling ourselves about the hardships on this path — never mind, let these children's future be great — and now we have to hear such words from you? You have not done a good thing. What a pity.”

Another said: “...the post turned out to hurt the feelings of many women teachers who are advanced in years and who support their families by honest means. It would have been fine, but even if it is the truth, perhaps it should not have been presented this way.” My respected teachers! I apologize that my words hurt your hearts. Thank you for sharing your opinion and writing a letter! There is no insult to you here, nor any denial of your labor and hardship; rather, there is a statement of the seriousness of the situation. In the texts both of you wrote, too, the sensitivity characteristic of women can be felt. On the contrary, an acknowledgment such as “Akrom Malik, you are right, it would be good if there were more male teachers in our schools” would have been a truly deep word. They were also offended by the word xotin (“woman”), whereas the word xotin originally means a woman who leads a state. The word ayol, on the other hand, carries the meaning of one who cares for the family. 👉 See. Let us look the truth in the eye, look at life, admit that today our sons are not receiving a genuine male upbringing, and take measures to solve the issue in practice. Otherwise, we will be caught in a whirlpool of even more serious problems in this matter. Let us not overlook the danger of cases of orientation disorders tragically increasing. Let us rack our brains more over how our sons, whose worldview remains like a child's, will manage a family tomorrow. Then our words will not hurt you; rather, they will seem very sensible to you, and you will begin to support them. I hope that our esteemed sister teachers have understood these views of ours correctly and will take this aspect into account in raising their own children as well. To young men choosing a profession we say: dear friends! Become teachers! Today schools need male teachers; your decision is important for the future of the whole Homeland and people! Come back to the schools, male teachers!

Akrom MALIK